Theres no doubtfulness ab step up it that there was a plot to blow parliament up inonly was Guy Fawkes re consort the sense to blame? I personally believe that Guy Fawkes was non to be blamed, only Robert Cecil I believe was; some of these semens bottom up this statement: In source A, it tells us that the wine root cellar was rented to one of the pulverization plotters by deception Whynniard, who was a ally of Cecils.
Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes Sorry, something has gone wrong. Well then you're not looking very hard because it's well-established that the plot was genuine. There have only been a few respected academics in history who have supported the idea that the Earl of Salisbury was involved in the plot.
It's simply unfounded nonsense. Why, certainly, dear Thomas!
It's quite well-established from the writings of the plotters themselves, plus the various people who saw them gallivanting around the Continent looking for Catholics to recruit to kill James and put his daughter on the throne and then recorded those unfortunate misadventures in their own writings, to be discovered by later historians, such as Phillip III's stooge, Don Juan de Tassis, whom Thomas Wintour tried to persuade to invade England.
It was actually during these pursuits than the Wintour brothers first met Guy Fawkes, who was in Flanders killing Protestants for the Spanish Crown. And when they had formulated their devious plot, they had to seek out a Jesuit to ensure that it would not affect their chances of getting past Purgatory, one Father Henry Garnet, who wrote back to his superiors in Rome very concerned about the morality of murdering a God-anointed monarch, and wanted His Holiness The Pope to make a statement dissuading English Catholics from using force against their King.
I could go on, but I sense there is no point to it. Believe the conspiracy theories if you will, but they're wrong, and no real academic thinks them even credible. There was no MI5 in the early 17th century, and the Houses of Parliament were nothing like they are today.
People lived, worked, and did business right in the thick of it. As for gunpowder, although there were laws which put the Crown in charge of the trade, enforcement of laws was another matter altogether in the early 17th century.
I imagine they procured the gunpowder in much the same way that the Protestant rebels from Monmouth's Rebellion later in the century did - illegally.
It was quite simple, really. There were no forensic accountants in some government office scrutinizing questionable transactions. It's not like the King's troops scoured the streets of London breaking into carts on a daily basis looking for gunpowder.The Gunpowder Plot of , in earlier centuries often called the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason, was a failed assassination attempt against King James I of England and VI of Scotland by a group of provincial English Catholics led by Robert Catesby.
In November , the infamous Gunpowder Plot took place in which some Catholics, most famously Guy Fawkes, plotted to blow up James I, the first of the Stuart kings of England.
Investigation that asks puipils to challenge the conventional view of the Gunpowder plot with differentiated activties and sources/5(3).
Guido Fawkes revealed the names of the conspirators. The Catholic View – The Conspirators were framed by the Protestants.
Many historians today agree with the Catholics of the time that the Gunpowder Plot conspirators were framed by James I’s chief minister, Robert Cecil. This essay will discuss the Gunpowder Plot of when a group of catholic noblemen plotted to blow up the English House of Parliament; the target of the plot was King James VI of Scotland and I of England.
This essay will focus on how the event impacted Catholics and their treatment in society and law after the event. Jun 04, · i have to write a history essay on whether the gunpowder plotters were framed and have found a lot of evidence to prove they were framed but can't find anything to say they weren't Update: To Josh, what evidence is there though that the plot was regardbouddhiste.com: Resolved.