Closing Argument The final factual and legal argument made by each attorney on all sides of a case in a trial prior to a verdict or judgment. Just as trials begin with attorneys making statements about the case, they end with a direct address to the judge or jury. The Opening Statement lays out what each side intends to prove; the closing argument, which is generally more forceful, has broader ambitions.
Opening Statement The opening statement at the beginning of the trial is limited to outlining facts. Absent strategic reasons not to do so, parties should lay out for the jurors who their Closing arguement are, how they are related to the parties and to each other, and what each is expected to say on the witness stand.
Smith will testify under oath that she saw Mr. They come at the end of the trial. Closing Argument Only after the jury has seen and heard the factual evidence of the case are the parties allowed to try to persuade them about its overall significance.
Closing arguments are the opportunity for each party to remind jurors about key evidence presented and to persuade them to adopt an interpretation favorable to their position. At this point, parties are free to use hypothetical analogies to make their points; to comment on the credibility of the witnesses, to discuss how they believe the various pieces of the puzzle fit into a compelling whole, and to advocate why jurors should decide the case in their favor.
Key Difference There is a critical difference between opening statements and closing arguments. In opening statements, parties are restricted to stating the evidence: In closing arguments, the parties are free to argue the merits:Closing Argument Only after the jury has seen and heard the factual evidence of the case are the parties allowed to try to persuade them about its overall significance.
Closing arguments are the opportunity for each party to remind jurors about key evidence presented and to persuade them to adopt an interpretation favorable to their position.
Transcript: Closing Argument by Defense Attorney Peter D. Greenspun Friday, November 14, ; PM.
The following is a transcript of the Nov. 13 closing argument by defense attorney Peter D. Greenspun in the capital murder trial of John Allen Muhammad. This is from a preliminary. Closing Argument is a monthly law column by Don Carroll that examines laws in the US and Italy, often through the context of current events, to bring perspective to their distinctly different legal systems.
Nov 22, · is called closing arguments, which is where both parties sum up their concluding.
Statement by reiterating the important arguments for the jury. A closing argument. occurs after the presentation of evidence.
What should be in a prosecutor’s closing. Apr 18, · How to Write a Closing Argument. A closing argument is delivered by an attorney at the end of a trial, after all of the evidence has been presented, witnesses and experts have been questioned, and the theory behind a prosecution or a 86%().
Thoroughbred pedigree for Closing Argument, progeny, and female family reports from the Thoroughbred Horse Pedigree Query.